The Pros and Cons of Going After David Price
It’s that time of year again. David Price is available… and somebody will probably get him this time. Should the Braves do so? Well, let’s at least do our due diligence and weigh out the pros and cons of such a deal.
The Pros
“using your farm system as leverage to improve the major league team is a good and valid strategy”
Price
is under contract through 2015.
He is not a “rental” pitcher. He would be available through the 2015 season. That should make the cost of obtaining him much more palatable, but I’ll get to that later.
The Cons
Live Feed
Jays Journal
The trade will be costly to the farm system. Big time.
The Braves took a large hit when
Gavin Floydwent down for the year… maybe not so much about the loss of his arm (since I believe he would have been traded within the next week or so), but in terms of the prospect(s) Atlanta might have received in return. If I were doing it, I would have been making sure that I knew of the Rays’ needs so that I could make a Floyd deal that looked forward to a Price deal. Unfortunately, that’s now all a moot point.
A deal for David Price would certainly require the Braves’ best prospect:
. It would probably also require David Hale, plus another significant minor league player or two. I would offer
Joey Terdoslavich, as he provides utility to the Rays, and he has little future with his current organization. Any way you slice it, though, that’s a big price to pay (no pun intended).
The Rebuttals
- Salary. Believe it or not, this is actually not an issue. The Braves went a bit beyond their own comfort zone in getting Ervin Sanata and Gavin Floyd. They cost the team a total of $18,000,000. Huh. Interesting number, given my projection for Price’s cost in 2015.
- Atlanta has $77,658,000 in committed salary for 2015 already with 8 arbitration cases. Two are significant: Mike Minor and Kris Medlen. Ryan Doumit and Gerald Laird are free agents – one or both are likely gone. Still, that leaves quite a bit of payroll space for a David Price.
- Even in 2014, the Braves had to have budgeted for performance bonuses that Gavin Floyd would have earned – another $4 million (+/-) for additional starts that now will not occur. Price is due roughly $7 million more this year… yes, it’s a stretch, but should not be out of the question.
- Supposing Atlanta were to try and take the extraordinary step of getting David Price signed up for an extension (which would have to be 5-6 years at $22-24 million each), then the numbers are not terribly out of the question: Dan Uggla and Justin Upton come off the books in 2016 (the same year a Price extension would begin).
- Yes pitchers are risky, but then so are the pitchers that would be given up in trade. Lucas Sims is the best we’ve got to offer, but frankly, would you rather have a Ace Cy Young Award winner or a guy who might develop into one?
- Finally, the Braves are in an interesting predicament: they typically draft late because they have been typically good. We don’t get extra draft picks for “competitive balance” or anything else. On average, their farm system will therefore not produce as many top-flight prospects… unless their scouting is better than that of other teams. On-field evidence suggests this is the case, but the point here is that using your farm system as leverage to improve the major league team is a good and valid strategy. Obviously this should be done wisely, but with many players now signed to long-term deals, it makes sense to sell assets that will not be needed.
Yes – in terms of full disclosure – I am an advocate of the Braves trying to muster a trade for David Price. I’ve made no secret of this. But as I’ve tried to make the case for such a deal – with a mindful eye in the other direction – I want to know what y’all think: do it or not? But please also give us your reasons in the comments section below!