Atlanta Braves Morning Chop: the only time I will talk about Bryce Harper

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Bryce Harper #34 of the Washington Nationals jogs off the field during the end of the third inning against the Miami Marlins at Nationals Park on September 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Rob Carr/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 26: Bryce Harper #34 of the Washington Nationals jogs off the field during the end of the third inning against the Miami Marlins at Nationals Park on September 26, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Rob Carr/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit
Prev
2 of 5
Next
WASHINGTON, DC – JULY 16: Freddie Freeman of the Atlanta Braves and Bryce Harper #34 shake hands during the T-Mobile Home Run Derby at Nationals Park on July 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC – JULY 16: Freddie Freeman of the Atlanta Braves and Bryce Harper #34 shake hands during the T-Mobile Home Run Derby at Nationals Park on July 16, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Patrick Smith/Getty Images) /

The Buddy System

There are apparently at least 2 people connected with the Braves that believe this is a possibility. Newly-minted TV analyst Jeff Francoeur is one of them:

https://twitter.com/Steviebreech/status/1075311033223340032

The other is current first baseman Freddie Freeman, who may have done some lobbying of Harper to join the Braves.

We do know that Freeman can be quite persuasive when it comes to important personnel matters – such as choosing field managers – so we can’t dismiss this out of hand.

Freeman is not an idiot – he isn’t going to sabotage the team for the sake of one player’s personality, and when you contrast the Braves team with the non-functional (not calling it ‘dysfunctional’, though at times this has been the case) relationships the Nationals have endured, Freeman’s influence could go a long way to helping Harper himself relax and be a better producer by keeping his intensity focused strictly on the field.

Still, there’s quite a long distance between a campaign and a $300+ million check.

About the Money

This gets to something I have heard about via former GM’s on the Sirius XM/MLB Network Radio channel in recent weeks, so I can’t provide a link to back up the veracity of this next claim.  That said, I believe it was Steve Phillips who suggested that monies like those that Manny Machado and Harper expect to command come under a special kind of spending category – one that transcends the ‘normal’ payroll expenditure.

If a club has the resources – as Derek Schiller told Dave O’Brien – they can spend it.  It would be more-or-less a special expenditure for the term of the contract… perhaps one that doesn’t actually impact the ‘regular’ budget at all, but one that is approved by the ownership for specific, special players.

It would make sense for a budget item like this that ownership signs off on it… clearly, for this is a situation with automatic risk involved – it’s essentially a requirement.

The team would still have to be able to do their normal expenditures for baseball operations, and that’s why it would be best to make a ‘whole organization’ commitment to a special budget increase for the duration.

If the Braves would choose to operate in this manner, it would be akin to the same sort of ‘buy-in’ that was made to build two stadiums (Cobb County and in Florida):  a new ‘capital outlay’ commitment of perhaps $20 million for a duration of 10-12 years.  [yes – that’s the right number; I’ll explain why below]

Thus instead of a budget of perhaps $140 million, it might be jumped to $160 million (adding the extra margin above other outfielders Atlanta could be seeking via the original budget) strictly because of this player.

The indication above is that it’s technically doable; whether Terry McGwirk and Schiller would sign off – especially given the current debt servicing already happening – is up for debate.

They would have to be convinced that Harper’s presence would lead to increased gate receipts and general economic activity (MLB teams share merchandising revenue, so you can’t point simply to jersey sales, but there would be benefits).  Still, this is quite plausible.